Carol knew something was seriously wrong when her husband tried to baptize the parakeet.
This was spring 2000, when Carol and x been taking a controversial prescription drug which was causing the once easy-going family man to exhibit dramatic changes in personality.
He became obsessed with the Bible and would often walk about his west-end home and law office quoting from the Book of Revelation. Calling himself the Spirit of Truth, he sprinkled one of his children, the family dog and the cat with ``holy'' tap water.
On one occasion, he tried to bring back an elderly man from the dead.
Last September, his family had him admitted to the Clarke Institute of Psychiatry. Released four days later, he sued his mother, sisters, brother, a doctor and a former client for $15 million.
Today x 48, is still practising law. He is living with another woman. His ex-wife and children have been on and off welfare and he has drained almost all of his 84-year-old mother's life's savings. He recently declared bankruptcy.
And his family contends it is all because of a little blue pill.
Its generic name is methylphenidate, often sold under the brand name Ritalin. While it's considered effective in the treatment of Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) in children, if snorted, injected or used in higher than recommended doses, it can produce effects similar to amphetamines or cocaine, says Pearl I, a pharmacist at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.
And the mere mention of it brings tears of rage to Carol's eyes
``The xwe all knew and loved is gone and my life has been shattered because of Ritalin. . . ,'' she laments.
She knows firsthand the pain that Ritalin can cause - she herself became addicted.
``I've been devastated emotionally and financially by what's happened to x,'' adds x's mother, Dr. L who has had to move in with one of her daughters.
x, meanwhile, can't understand why his family has turned on him. In a recent interview, he describes himself as a deeply religious man who ``may be the spirit of truth.''
Given the right circumstances, he says, he can revive the dead. He tried it in a house where an elderly man had collapsed and died.
x adds that this particular resurrection, a few weeks after the man had been buried, failed because the wife of the deceased ``didn't want him back.''
``I told them that it was all right to cry for him, because he was at peace,'' x recalls.
According to x, Christ has repeatedly visited Earth, inhabiting the bodies of such geniuses as da Vinci, Handel and Shakespeare.
But one need not be a celebrity to experience a visitation from on high. He says he once saw Jesus riding a bicycle on Jane St. in the guise of a 90-year-old man. The man was a dead ringer for the Mona Lisa, and looked a lot like the newly discovered painting of Shakespeare.
And the pill that x's wife claims destroyed his family, he labels a blessing.
He says Ritalin helped him to become ``more assertive,'' and ``focused,'' adding that he hasn't needed it since last fall.
``I couldn't have done this restructuring of my life without it,'' he says.
x says his law practice is extremely successful, billing $10,000 a month in fees, and adds that he pays $2,000 in monthly support for his former wife and children.
He filed for bankruptcy this spring after his statement of claim against his mother and sisters was struck down by a judge who described his litany of allegations as ``long, rambling and largely incoherent.''
The x family's nightmare began in early 1997 when Carol became concerned that her eldest child wasn't doing well at school. Her psychiatrist gave her the name of a Toronto child psychiatrist who was known for his rapport with adolescents.
That child psychiatrist diagnosed the boy as suffering from ADD and prescribed Ritalin.
Soon afterward, Carol brought another son to see the doctor and she was told that he also had ADD. He took home a prescription for Ritalin, too.
Within a short time, Carol became curious about the little blue pill.
``I could see one of my kids wasn't really improving and the other said it gave him headaches and made him feel sick. I'd heard a lot about the drug and I wondered what it would do for me,'' she recalls.
After ingesting one Ritalin tablet, she felt so energetic that she cleaned up the kitchen in five minutes.
Soon, her husband tried his son's prescription as well. Then, he asked his psychiatrist, who had been treating him for depression, to prescribe Ritalin for him. The psychiatrist agreed but that summer, the couple decided to switch to their children's psychiatrist, who explained that ADD runs in families - and gave them each a Ritalin prescription.
By 1998, the xs' only daughter and S's brother were also on the drug.
``x thought Ritalin was the answer to everything,'' Carol remembers.
She herself was popping the pill every hour. ``It made me feel really good,'' she recalls. ``I had all these grandiose ideas about things I could do, so I started making all kinds of crafts. But I couldn't finish things. I also felt irritable. And if I didn't keep taking Ritalin, I would feel depressed.''
But the drug, she says, was having quite a different effect on her husband.
x had never been especially interested in religion. But now it was his obsession. He began neglecting his law practice and his family to work on a video game which he believed would teach Christian values to teenagers.
He has set about finding investors in the video game and to date has raised $48,000, he says, adding that he is still working on the game.
In an e-mail to David Mainse, pastor of Canada's 100 Huntley Street television ministry, x says that extensive study of the Bible led him to conclude that the Day of Judgment is near and Christ will soon ascend to his throne in New York City.
``For various reasons, I happen to believe that Christ lives not far from here (in Toronto). . . . When the story of how he spent the last 2000 years is told I am certain everyone will agree that he deserves a rest. I think he has done his part,'' x writes in this July 19, 2000 correspondence.
Once he found religion, his family became irritants, Carol remembers. ``He went from this kind, caring, loving man to a very critical person, where neither I nor the kids could do anything right.''
She turned more and more to Ritalin to cope. She became hopelessly addicted, often taking as many as 40 pills a day, more than four times the recommended dose.
Carol sometimes stole pills from her husband and her own children.
In the early summer of 1998, ``after hitting bottom,'' she entered into an eight-week detox and rehabilitation treatment program.
After her release, depressed and desperate, Carol switched to another psychiatrist, who prescribed Dexedrine, a stimulant similar to Ritalin which is also used to treat ADD. She was hooked on it within eight months.
x, she recalls, was taking large doses of Ritalin and, for a time, also took Dexedrine. She says he had become so obsessed with the video game that his once $90,000-a-year salary tumbled to just $22,000 in 1999. Several times, he moved out of the family home to sleep in the basement of his office, only to return home again.
Convinced that his problems were largely caused by Ritalin, x's eldest sons, mother and wife contacted the children's psychiatrist and asked that he be taken off the drug. In February, 2000, after the psychiatrist failed to do so, the family filed complaints against him with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, the regulatory body governing doctors.
The children's psychiatrist told The Star in a recent interview that ADD is widely underdiagnosed. He would not, however, comment on the complaints except to say that he ``categorically denies'' the allegations. His medical practice continues to be in good standing, according to a college spokesperson, and the family's complaints have not yet been dealt with.
In July, 2000, x moved out, leaving his wife and children with no money, a hefty mortgage and $30,000 in unpaid bills. His behaviour and religious obsession worried his mother and two sisters, who noticed he had lost weight and looked ill.
So x's mother, sisters and a brother had him committed to the Clarke Institute of Psychiatry last September on the grounds that he lacked the competence to care for himself.
He was diagnosed as suffering from a ``bipolar manic disorder, a substance- induced psychotic disorder, a substance-induced manic episode and amphetamine intoxication.''
The institute kept him involuntarily for a 72-hour assessment and asked him to remain a day to finish tests. After that, he signed himself out and filed a $15 million lawsuit against his own family for having him committed.
He later amended it to $800,000 and at one point offered to settle with a brother for an apology and lunch at his favourite restaurant.
It was the start of a series of actions within the family.
x then filed his own complaint to the college against his mother - a family doctor who went to medical school after raising her eight children and who retired in 1989 at age 71. He accuses her of illegally writing prescriptions for herself and family members.
When his sister a, a lawyer who works for a government agency, learned her brother had tapped their mother for some $250,000 in loans and loan guarantees, she complained to the Law Society of Upper Canada.
x fought back by complaining to the society about a, saying she was ``either a criminal, delusional, or both.''
He tried to get a and his other sister i, a York University technician, fired from their jobs by writing to their supervisors.
``Our intentions were to get him help . . . and we can't seem to get it for him,'' i said of the reason she filed her complaint with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
The Ss have so far spent more than $30,000 fighting x's lawsuit, which Justice Anne M called a ``long, rambling and largely incoherent set of allegations made by the plaintiff against his mother and siblings.''
In his lawsuit, x says that being arrested and taken to the institute had a profound effect on his psyche, and a dramatic effect on his ability to earn a living. The detention, he says, was based on ``lies, delusions or deliberate distortions,'' which caused him to ``miss dinner (and) an evening with friends.''
x claims he was ``born into a home of neglect,'' and that his mother had dedicated her life to ``personal self-fulfilment'' rather than the emotional needs of her children.
M struck down x's motions, but she said he is free to come back to court with a new claim after he pays the $6,000 in costs she awarded his family for fighting the case.
``It's been a nightmare,'' a says, adding that the family is convinced Ritalin is the root cause of her brother's dramatic personality changes, and that's why they've gone to such lengths to get him the help they believe he needs.
But x believes it's his family who needs help. ``My relationship with them is not very heavenly and it's not my fault,'' he says.
When his sisters pleaded with him to change psychiatrists, x said he had no problem.
x filed for bankruptcy in May of this year, owing almost $400,000 - including the $135,000 loan which his mother had guaranteed as well as the $6,000 he was ordered to pay his family for the failed lawsuit.
He blames his wife for his financial troubles.
Dr. L, with the help of her daughters, tried to recover her financial losses from the law society. In her complaint she said her son ``fraudulently or negligently'' deprived her of her life's savings. But x claims this is just her cynical attempt to punish him for not giving her enough attention when he was a boy.
In a letter dated May 18, 2001, three days after x filed for bankruptcy, Doug Kr, head of investigations at the law society, wrote that officials were closing the probe after investigators found nothing wrong with the way x was operating his practice.
Today, the entire S family has stopped taking Ritalin. Carol S has borrowed money from her family to enable her to remain in the family home.
And x continues to work on his religious video game and waits for Christ to return - again